![[identity profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/openid.png)
![[community profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/community.png)
The next fic was nominated by
lightlack and enthusiastically seconded by myself. It’s written by
threeguesses, who is one of my favorite writers to come out of the pre/post IWTB era. Her writing in this fandom was not prolific, but her stories have always stood out (at least for me) for their powerful concepts, enthralling emotional currents, and the deceptive simplicity of threeguesses’ writing. Undoubtedly you know how "five things" fics work, in which case you also know the title of this week’s fic tells you just about everything that can be revealed about it without spoiling the sense of discovery that comes with each new segment.
five things that never happened to dana scully
The author is still around and writing up a storm (though sadly not in this fandom), and I’m sure she would appreciate feedback. There’s lots to say about this fic, so please do let us know what you think. And, as always, the nomination post is open for new suggestions.
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
![[livejournal.com profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/external/lj-userinfo.gif)
five things that never happened to dana scully
The author is still around and writing up a storm (though sadly not in this fandom), and I’m sure she would appreciate feedback. There’s lots to say about this fic, so please do let us know what you think. And, as always, the nomination post is open for new suggestions.
no subject
Date: 2012-02-29 10:24 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-29 10:25 pm (UTC)Yes, I found it deliciously twisted and dark. MS and RT pushed the envelope farther than I could've imagined possible, and they kept me hanging on every sharp twist. Plus, wasn't TO the fic that used quotes from Rosencrantz and Guildenstern are Dead as headers? Those quotes were the perfect mix of creepy-dark and flippant.
no subject
Date: 2012-02-29 10:27 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-29 10:29 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-02-29 10:33 pm (UTC)Yes. That's the one. Maybe we should do it as a rerun sometime? We read it last in 2008. Story number five or six, I think it was.
no subject
Date: 2012-02-29 10:40 pm (UTC)Scully is a privileged individual: she has access to birth control and more information about the way the world works than the average career woman. Yet she insists on a child of her own, despite her physical incapacity. She spends a lot of money, risks enemy attacks, and humiliates herself and her audience hideously in that scene where she essentially says to Mulder, "Hold the elevator. I want some of your sperm."
Then, after CC and Co. realized that a precious little baby would fuck up their plot trajectory, Scully puts this emotionally and financially expensive child up for adoption. To (perhaps) preserve the life she had insisted on creating.
I realize I'm blaming Scully for all the stupidity of the show's writers and producers. But I do not think she made a good decision. If she were my friend I'd hug and support her and offer to babysit, but I would think she was not firing on all cylinders.
As for amyhit's comment about ignoring canon: sure. There are parts of canon I don't only ignore but wish I could forget. Still, I don't see any need to deny Scully's tenderness with children. Motherhood is not an inborn skill, as W says; awkwardness and mistakes are part of the role. (Though I do believe that it helps, as Scully does, to have a good mother of your own.)
no subject
Date: 2012-02-29 11:24 pm (UTC)When she’s finished (she had a spiel, she’d planned) he just says, Okay Scully. He helps her carry the boxes to her car, shuts her trunk. They say goodbye in the parking garage, Scully’s heels sinking into a puddle. He waves as she pulls out.
This is written exceptionally well. The first time I read it I remember knowing, before reading any further, that this was the end for them. That after this whatever was between them would wither away. It's right there in the writing, in the way things are phrased. They don't "part company", they say goodbye. And there's this seperation already, the way they see themselves in relation to each other: Scully in the car, pulling away, and Mulder standing there in the parking garage, waving goodbye.
Mulder knows, of course, because Mulder would know, the way bonds are broken and people change. He would know that his life is not compatible with the one she's leaving for, and vice versa. As I see it, that's what his quiet, "Okay Scully," means. It means there's nothing for him to argue about or barter for. He knows how this will go, and he understands.
To me it all makes perfect sense.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-01 12:29 am (UTC)So there we are.
The work was the medium and the impetus for their relationship at that point.
So, at what point do you think that did change? Because it must have changed somewhere along the way for them to have ended up together at the end in IWTB, without the work to keep them together. Or do you just leave canon behind entirely after Requiem (a perfectly understandable choice, by the way, given the canon we were given)?
no subject
Date: 2012-03-01 10:08 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-01 11:47 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-01 12:03 pm (UTC)At some point perhaps we could even read the Dance Card trilogy here (all three at once, I'd imagine). As OOC as they are, Sab's a good writer, and a charismatic writer, and they could be fun to discuss.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-01 02:29 pm (UTC)Or we could read more "Five Things" stories? I have a small collection of them.
I suppose I should check the queue first.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-01 10:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-01 11:38 pm (UTC)Well, I do completely disregard IWTB canon, and I usually attempt to disregard all but the most basic elements of S8 and S9 canon. However, I think your question is still entirely valid, and it was something I asked myself while I was typing up my previous comment.
The trouble is, I think the work is an absolutely fundamental aspect of both their relationship, and of who they are as people. In my headcanon quiting isn’t really a possibility. Technically they’re both at liberty to quit at any time, but it’s just not something either of them could find it in themselves to do. So for me, the question isn’t so much “When did the work stop being the medium and impetus for their relationship?” because I don’t think it ever really does stop being that. But as time goes on something kind of paradoxical happens, where more and more their relationship becomes the medium and impetus for the work, as well.
Short answer: I think by the end of FTF their relationship was capable of sustaining them when they needed it to.
(I should perhaps make clear that by "the work" I never just mean their FBI cases. I mean the whole epic experience of the work, the quest for answers, and the war they find themselves embroiled in.)
no subject
Date: 2012-03-03 08:32 pm (UTC)Eh eh.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-03 08:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-03 08:51 pm (UTC)Never read these but IIRC I was pretty impressed by 'Woods and Nails' by the same author.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-03 08:59 pm (UTC)So I guess, this situation in "Emily" never struck me as odd or unfair, it seemed pretty logical to me. *shrug*
no subject
Date: 2012-03-03 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-03 09:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-03 09:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-03 09:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2012-03-03 09:11 pm (UTC)Cool. Done.
Yep, I totally agree with your Sam comments somewhere above.
I see. Metafic is a good way of approaching this.
I haven't read "Up The Ladder" yet, nor the Syntax6 fic, so I don't really have any other points of reference for this scenario.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-03 09:14 pm (UTC)And now nobody is going to convince me that these two aren't soulmates.
no subject
Date: 2012-03-03 09:23 pm (UTC)Pardon my French but FUCK YEAH!